View Full Version : how does the intercooler flow work on an 818
auburn2
10-01-2013, 11:18 PM
On an impreza a forward facing hood scoop flows air in and down through the intercooler. Looking at the 818 there are two vents that look to be over where the intercooler sits but I don't see anything indicating how the air will be forced or directed down through it. Does the 818 include an intercooler fan or anything?
JeromeS13
10-01-2013, 11:39 PM
No fan. The two top vents are channeled inwards toward the intercooler.
Mechie3
10-02-2013, 07:55 AM
It uses sheet metal pieces along with the top fiberglass piece to direct the air to it. The GRM build might have photos of it.
Goldwing
10-02-2013, 09:12 PM
As I recall, reports from the open house mentioned the FFR guys found that the airflow was sufficient through the shoulder vents, through the intercooler, further aided by a vacuum from airflow underneath the engine. Time will verify that I guess.
longislandwrx
10-03-2013, 10:53 AM
22236
Here's a nice picture of how it works
Mechie3
10-03-2013, 12:50 PM
Which reminds me....my aftermarket TMIC won't work with those....doh!
305mouse
10-03-2013, 03:11 PM
AWIC time
Frank818
10-03-2013, 07:55 PM
AWIC time
Right on!
RM1SepEx
10-03-2013, 08:22 PM
22236
Here's a nice picture of how it works
what is the purpose of the vent aft of the intercooler in the trunk panel?
JeromeS13
10-03-2013, 08:56 PM
I would assume it's to create a low pressure area above the deck lid, to help suck hot air out of the engine bay.
longislandwrx
10-04-2013, 06:27 AM
Which reminds me....my aftermarket TMIC won't work with those....doh!
Why not? The manual shows that they are trim to fit. Also, the R is running a larger intercooler.
also, how good does that carbon diffuser look down in there!
Mechie3
10-04-2013, 07:55 AM
AWIC time
Translation: Spend more $$ time!
Why not? The manual shows that they are trim to fit. Also, the R is running a larger intercooler.
The R has the passenger headrest area cutout IIRC. What i meant was, I'd have to trim/fab up new stuff to make it work, not just bolt it in. Not a big deal, just something I'd forgotten about.
Santiago
10-04-2013, 08:55 AM
also, how good does that carbon diffuser look down in there!
I just saw that! Sexy!
Maybe it's just me, but I can't seem to find any good pics of the carbon rear diffuser from the outside/rear of the car. Anyone have a good shot of it?
Best,
-j
longislandwrx
10-04-2013, 09:08 AM
I think you have to trim it for the stock one anyway, it says allow 3/4 gap around the perimeter for engine movement.
See page 449 I'll know for sure tomorrow :D
BrandonDrums
10-21-2013, 09:58 AM
Yeah, I hate to say it but there's just not enough airflow in this setup. Either a snorkel needs to be installed, the IC re-located to the rear mesh area of the tail or an AWIC needs to be installed. Heck, even some PVC piping routed from the front grill area would provide more flow. You know if the R version is getting heat soak with the entire passenger hump ducting air to the IC that the street version is practically un-ventilated.
Color me a little disappointed. Who wants to try to fit a pair of these to the humps?
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/3/846/2441/27113720031_large.jpg
Mechie3
10-21-2013, 10:07 AM
I think they also mentioned on the R version that the turbo wasn't well shielded.
BrandonDrums
10-21-2013, 01:18 PM
I think they also mentioned on the R version that the turbo wasn't well shielded.
True but still, that whole engine compartment is pretty closed in. I'd be interested to see the IC surface temps on a stock setup with the heat shield installed.
BrandonDrums
10-21-2013, 01:40 PM
Actually, does anyone know if the fender vents get opened up at all or are people just painting them black? Looks like you could cut a hole and put some ducting in the top corner of those vents to incorporate more flow into the existing vents going to the IC. That would be more than double the flow....
http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af89/BrandondrumsWRX/side_vents_zpsefc71aed.png
Mechie3
10-21-2013, 02:36 PM
They get cut open. FFR supplies precut mesh and trim rings for that area. Wayne just decided not to use it.
Here's an Exige with a shroud over the intercooler feed with the roof top scoop. Making a similar shroud fed with a hose from the side scoop is something I'd like to see someone try.
http://www.geocities.ws/lotus_2008_exiges240/HeatBarrierGarageDog.jpg
Wayne Presley
10-21-2013, 06:50 PM
The air to air intercooler doesn't work as well as the AWIC, not close.
Frank818
10-21-2013, 07:09 PM
The air to air intercooler doesn't work as well as the AWIC, not close.
Of course it doesn't! :)
All hails AWIC! :)
Frank818
10-21-2013, 07:09 PM
http://www.geocities.ws/lotus_2008_exiges240/HeatBarrierGarageDog.jpg
Is that another one of your dog collection?
BrandonDrums
10-23-2013, 04:19 PM
The air to air intercooler doesn't work as well as the AWIC, not close.
Of course not but this is an FFR we're talking about. There's gotta be some simple solution we can implement to allow as much if not more airflow to the stock intercooler than the donor vehicle had.
As it sits now, the 'pitch' of the 818 is the single donor vehicle and kit package. It shouldn't be a requirement to invest into an AWIC to have a reliable engine unless FFR is willing to include them with the kit....The target market for the 818 is the average joe who's going to buy a used stock WRX example and worry about upgrades later. If that means driving around with a glowing hot intercooler and tons of det then he might not even be able to afford the upgrades later because he'll be getting engine rebuilds.
By all means, I'd love to see AWIC be a standard feature. Otherwise, I think we're going to need a better setup to get more airflow to the intercooler on the stock unit. I really wish I had an example to work on myself.
I do think some intercooler piping routed from the side vents nozzled onto the intercooler will do wonders. Even PVC will work. I'm thinking take a 2.5 or 3'' pipe cut with an angle to fit in the top corner of the side vent routed up to the existing 'ducts' could help a whole bunch. Doing pipes instead of aluminum panel ducts from the top vents that are merged into a Y fitting with the lower vents would be probably about all you need if there's a nice fitting shroud. That would about as much airflow as you'd ever need.
Another option is to move the intercooler all the way back to the mesh opening on the rear of the car. That far back you don't have as much direct radiant heat exposure and the reverse induction effects on that vertical flat trailing surface would far exceed the stock hoodscoop.
^
Longer piping = more lag
Slatt
10-24-2013, 03:06 AM
It seems to me the existing FFR ducting to the intercooler provides an adequate path for cool air, but there is not enough differential pressure between those side inlet ducts and the engine bay outlets (there's a lot of outlet!) to create much flow. A pull-thru fan mounted below the I/C with a shroud would surely solve the problem. This was never a good option in a WRX (firewall and bobble-strut in the way) but surely there's room in the 818??? Yes, the shroud has to work around the I/C inlet pipes, so it'd be a little complicated to make.
Maybe a current kit builder could eyeball that option? I reckon a shroud could be mocked up / proven with kivex and, once you are happy with it, finalized in aluminum. There is that mount on the tranny where the bobble-strut used to be to create a metal support for the fan. I dunno, can't say for sure, my kit's gonna be a long time coming.
Edit: ok, bad memory, that bobble mount is not on the tranny at all, it's from the firewall to a bracket and then to some-kind-of-darkness-I-couldn't-quite-make out. Still, I think that bracket can be used to support the fan. You didn't throw that bracket out did you? :)
One last edit: I'm looking at a 2003 WRX.
BrandonDrums
10-24-2013, 08:42 AM
^
Longer piping = more lag
Yeah but it's still relatively short compared to a FMIC kit on a stock WRX. Keeping it in the stock location and piping more flow to the IC from the side vents though....sounds like a probable fix.
I also like the fan idea, however it's hard to get a shroud to fit and seal well over all the pipes on the bottom of the IC.
Top mount = short piping, no airflow
Front mount wrx = pretty short with rotated turbo, great airflow
AWIC = short piping, need a more complicated system to make it work.
Im personally going with AWIC because Im running a larger turbo and need the best transient response possible.
Im willing to put up with the extra weight, complexity and cost of the AWIC system.
Top mount in a mid engined car is a joke.
Only other option would be to mount an air cooled ic behind the passengers headrest.
Air cooled ic needs massive flow ro be effective.
Xusia
10-24-2013, 12:58 PM
I also like the fan idea, however it's hard to get a shroud to fit and seal well over all the pipes on the bottom of the IC.
Radiator fans are effective and don't "seal" at all!
longislandwrx
10-24-2013, 02:52 PM
Top mount in a mid engined car is a joke.
Only other option would be to mount an air cooled ic behind the passengers headrest.
Air cooled ic needs massive flow ro be effective.
I disagree, the new forester xt has no scoop and only a small inlet, which doesn't constitute "massive airflow" and does a fine job cooling 250 hp. Guys are already making good power with the stock IC.
BrandonDrums
10-24-2013, 03:12 PM
Radiator fans are effective and don't "seal" at all!
...and they also aren't separated by 3'' worth of piping between them and the radiator surface. I was responding to another member's suggestion to have a puller fan between the IC and the rear mesh exit vent. A pusher fan mounted on top of the intercooler would work great.
The best shape for a top mount fan would be from a fireplace blower fan. You can get these for less than 100 bucks, they technically get their intake from the sides and come in all sorts of shapes.
I don't know how they'd stand up to weather though but they can easily be housed in an aluminium shroud directly on top if the IC. I don't know how much they'd flow without killing the alternator but could be a good route to take. I have a intercooler blower fan 'array' using 3 server cooling fans that held up to rain just fine. They didn't blow nearly enough to get the IC to ambient but they were great in preventing heat soak when I was sitting still. I have them mounted on aluminium rails that I just clip to the flanges in my IC during the summer.
This setup would be better though, I'm thinking of doing this on my WRX now. One of these 150 CFM units could easily fit in the hoodscoop and I could build an aluminium shroud for it that covers the top of the IC. With a little modification I'd still be able to get almost all the airflow at speed through the fan too I think.
http://www.electricmotorwarehouse.com/fireplace.htm
Here's a couple examples of these ranging from 12''-15'' long and 3.5 - 5'' high.
http://i.ebayimg.com/t/BK-Fireplace-Blower-for-Desa-Fireplaces-/00/s/NDMyWDU3Ng==/$T2eC16Z,!ysE9sy0i3e)BQN16fn)vQ~~60_35.JPG
http://www.fireplaceblowersonline.com/Images/Products/blot_large_fireplace_blower_1.png
http://www.electricmotorwarehouse.com/fireplace/R7-RB167.gif
RM1SepEx
10-24-2013, 03:15 PM
what good does a 115 volt fan do for you? You need to find a similar 12 volt model
250 might not even need an intercooler.
500 however, is a different story.
I disagree, the new forester xt has no scoop and only a small inlet, which doesn't constitute "massive airflow" and does a fine job cooling 250 hp. Guys are already making good power with the stock IC.
Mechie3
10-24-2013, 03:44 PM
250 might not even need an intercooler.
500 however, is a different story.
someone tried that. They also tried using meth to cool the air charge. In teh end they determine it wasn't worth the risk of detonation and the resulting lack of power from pulled timing and higher temp intake charge.
longislandwrx
10-24-2013, 04:13 PM
250 might not even need an intercooler.
500 however, is a different story.
Guys are making quite a bit more on the stock fozzy IC. Most 818s are going to be making stage 2 power, and the FFR setup will be fine. Saying "Top mount in a mid engined car is a joke." is silly especially when you consider that turbo 911s have long used that setup and still use a variation of it.
For your 500 hp 818, a top mount might not be for you. I'll look forward to seeing what you come up with.
flynntuna
10-24-2013, 05:30 PM
How about reusing the heater fan as a top mounted IC fan? build a shroud and have ductwork come from the side scoop. Would it be worth the effort?:confused:
JeromeS13
10-24-2013, 05:32 PM
someone tried that. They also tried using meth to cool the air charge. In teh end they determine it wasn't worth the risk of detonation and the resulting lack of power from pulled timing and higher temp intake charge.
It was Perrin. Definitely an interesting read:
http://blog.perrinperformance.com/your-sti-doesnt-need-an-intercooler-right/
BrandonDrums
10-25-2013, 09:59 AM
what good does a 115 volt fan do for you? You need to find a similar 12 volt model
They sell units without motors. I'm not suggesting running a 115 volt unit obviously.
How about reusing the heater fan as a top mounted IC fan? build a shroud and have ductwork come from the side scoop. Would it be worth the effort?:confused:
Hey, that's an awesome idea.
turbo 911s have long used that setup and still use a variation of it.
911 Turbo is a REAR engined car with a huge whale tail that houses the air to air IC to get the massive airflow necessary to make it work.
Perhaps I should clarify: a stock sized top mount IC for MY power goals in wheel to wheel racing would be a joke.
D
BrandonDrums
10-25-2013, 10:30 AM
Guys are making quite a bit more on the stock fozzy IC. Most 818s are going to be making stage 2 power, and the FFR setup will be fine. Saying "Top mount in a mid engined car is a joke." is silly especially when you consider that turbo 911s have long used that setup and still use a variation of it.
For your 500 hp 818, a top mount might not be for you. I'll look forward to seeing what you come up with.
I believe all WRX based 818's will at least be making stage 2 power. Aren't the FFR guys supplying a reflash tune? I thought that was something they announced when they quoted the HP figures of their factory model. Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly.
In any case, TMIC is certainly fine given the airflow. If you look at any turbo 911 with a top mount you'll see that that the intercooler isn't only massive compared to the wrx/sti OEM units but it's under a giant mesh opening and located directly above the cooling fan. It's also over a foot away from the turbo, not directly next to it like in subarus.
I disagree, the new forester xt has no scoop and only a small inlet, which doesn't constitute "massive airflow" and does a fine job cooling 250 hp. Guys are already making good power with the stock IC.
BUT, it's in the front of the car. Big difference in the 'ram air' effect than behind the cabin where the car wedges through the air creating a turbulent bubble all around it. The 818 R lacks a full widnshield and allows more 'clean' air to go into the scoop on the passenger hump and STILL got heatsoak with a larger turbo. The street version will probably have this issue with a stock donor setup.
I'm not saying the 818 doesn't have access to proper airflow, we're just saying a bit more ducting needs to take place to get it close to the stock levels of airflow from the donor.
Another thing to consider is the lack of a scoop/opening above the intercooler. In the 818, the intercooler is close but not directly under the mesh opening on the clamshell. That means a lot more heatsoak will take place in the engine bay without a little more venting of some sort.
Lastly, The intake air temperature sensor on WRX's is located in the MAF housing which is pre-turbo. The ECU has parameters to reduce timing as intake temperature goes up but that measurement doesn't account for the intercooler's effects unfortunately. This is a big shortcoming with the subaru engine management system and contributes a lot to the failure rates of these engines. Keeping the intercooler near ambient temperature is the only way outside of a standalone engine management system to ensure you aren't inducing knock conditions that the ECU can't detect to our cars.
longislandwrx
10-25-2013, 12:41 PM
911 Turbo is a REAR engined car with a huge whale tail that houses the air to air IC to get the massive airflow necessary to make it work.
D
Understood, the point being a non front engine configuration can still utilize a TMIC assuming proper airflow
Perhaps I should clarify: a stock sized top mount IC for MY power goals in wheel to wheel racing would be a joke.
D
Cool we are in agreement then. Not trying to argue, just thought you were saying that a TMIC was not a viable option.
I'll hopefully be putting 375 or so CHP through a coated Grimmspeed TMIC with coated header and uppipe, with a turbo blanket and heatshield. I'll be logging the data so I'll let you know what temps I'm seeing.
I'm not saying the 818 doesn't have access to proper airflow, we're just saying a bit more ducting needs to take place to get it close to the stock levels of airflow from the donor.
I can agree with this, however I do think the FFR supplied option will suffice for your basic stage two guys. Will there be heat soak? yes, will it be dangerous? no, the ots maps are very conservative and should be fine for most 818 enthusiasts
Mechie3
10-25-2013, 01:44 PM
One thing to consider...
I don't think there is room for the stock or a lot of aftermarket turbo heatsheilds. The turbo sits very close to the rear shock tower support.
Xusia
10-25-2013, 03:39 PM
Is there room to do something custom?
longislandwrx
10-25-2013, 03:49 PM
yes. the aftermarket ones are heavy gauge and very angular, but you should be able to come up with something that works well
Xusia
10-25-2013, 07:21 PM
I was thinking more along the lines of fabricating my own - or more rather, convincing my father-in-law to fabricate one for me! LOL
Cool we are in agreement then. Not trying to argue, just thought you were saying that a TMIC was not a viable option.
No worries.
Im sure lots of solutions will work.
Question is which option is best for our specific car?
Subaru chooses to suck air from a low pressure area to feed the IC.
Toyota tried that with the gt4 and opted to change that setup and exhaust out of the hood instead.
I personally think that for high hp situations, in our car, awic might be better.
We will see....
BrandonDrums
10-27-2013, 11:31 AM
No worries.
Im sure lots of solutions will work.
Question is which option is best for our specific car?
Subaru chooses to suck air from a low pressure area to feed the IC.
Toyota tried that with the gt4 and opted to change that setup and exhaust out of the hood instead.
I personally think that for high hp situations, in our car, awic might be better.
We will see....
AWIC will always be better. Were just trying to figure out a simple and affordable solution to improve the donor setup as we've mentioned before.
Here's another thought. Use pipes from the side vents with one of these "electric superchargers" installed in each to combat heatsoak in traffic stops and low speed. These things are a joke for what they are ''designed'' for but could be perfect in this application.
http://www.dhresource.com/albu_358762987_00-1.0x0/3-76mm-universal-electric-turbocharger-intake.jpg
AWIC wont alays be better.
Air to air as a front mount would still be my first choice because its much simpler, lighter and works well in a race situation.
AWIC is heavy and complex and neds a lot of water to cool the charge.
When we ran the KA powered supercharged motorsports Elise, we alays had issues with the water getting too hot, no matter how much we increased the capacity.
It was a time attack car and we ended up cooling the heat exchanger with Nitrous..
Wayne Presley
10-27-2013, 12:36 PM
AWIC wont alays be better.
Air to air as a front mount would still be my first choice because its much simpler, lighter and works well in a race situation.
AWIC is heavy and complex and neds a lot of water to cool the charge.
When we ran the KA powered supercharged motorsports Elise, we alays had issues with the water getting too hot, no matter how much we increased the capacity.
It was a time attack car and we ended up cooling the heat exchanger with Nitrous..
You didn't have enough heat exchanger up front, we run one and do not have issues road racing the Elise.
StatGSR
10-27-2013, 05:30 PM
Here's another thought. Use pipes from the side vents with one of these "electric superchargers" installed in each to combat heatsoak in traffic stops and low speed. These things are a joke for what they are ''designed'' for but could be perfect in this application.
idk about the electric super chargers, but you can get a blower fan like in the links below. Pegasus racing sells them and advertises them for use with their brake duct hose. if i was to try a "fan" i would start with something like that first. maybe a couple of them and a proper plenum might do the trick.
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/Images/L/CS471.JPG
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=5751
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=5752
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/advcat.asp?CategoryID=BRAKEDUCT
08Legacy08
10-29-2013, 07:20 PM
Hi Everyone - This is my first post. I'm a die-hard Subaru guy (hoping to be 818 guy soon!!!), having converted my LGT to a JDM S402 model (including full engine build).
I am just thinking out loud here, but I was kind of thinking going with a 2.5 single AVCS EJ255 (LegacyGT, early STI) and using 2618 Alloy pistons with anti-det grooves. With the softer and stronger pistons, I thought I would run Meth and maybe an IC sprayer in conjunction with the intake swap (STI/WRX style). At that point, I think we would get some additional leeway in the detonation department, while minimizing additional fans/duct work etc.
The benefit of the 2.5 is that it has AVCS (unlike the 2.0) and the engines are exactly the same physical size and shape; everything except for the intake and turbo is the same. Timing can be adjusted significantly with the AVCS and may be just what we need in those heat-soak situations... Transmission clutch type can be converted from the WRX, or, use LGT transmission. Again, it should be identical shape/size.
Again, I have a lot of learning to do but hopefully some of you can chime-in here!
Shaun
08Legacy08
10-29-2013, 07:30 PM
Hey guys - one more thing regarding heat shields. My experience is that if you run a PTP turbo blanket and lava-wrap your down pipe, heat is dramatically decreased... even more so with a shield on top of the blanket. :)
BrandonDrums
11-01-2013, 09:14 AM
idk about the electric super chargers, but you can get a blower fan like in the links below. Pegasus racing sells them and advertises them for use with their brake duct hose. if i was to try a "fan" i would start with something like that first. maybe a couple of them and a proper plenum might do the trick.
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/Images/L/CS471.JPG
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=5751
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=5752
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/advcat.asp?CategoryID=BRAKEDUCT
Both are basically the same thing. An "electric supercharger" is just a fan in a tube as well, they just try to sell them as an actual boosting device. The barely work but I'd go with the unit that flows the most air at the most reasonable price. That being said, your version looks much easier to install with it's uniform shape.
Hey guys - one more thing regarding heat shields. My experience is that if you run a PTP turbo blanket and lava-wrap your down pipe, heat is dramatically decreased... even more so with a shield on top of the blanket. :)
Absolutely, everyone should be doing this. That still doesn't solve the airflow issue though.
Search precision chassis.
They put an EJ into a boxter
Started off with a massive scoop running air to air.
Guess what theyre running now????
Real time, track proven results
Xusia
11-01-2013, 10:44 PM
...track proven results
Exactly. What's necessary/best for the track is not necessarily so for the street.
If I recall the meanderings of this thread, the concensus (if you can call it that), is that AWIC is probably the best route for track cars, but prob not necessary for street use - we just need to keep a conscious eye on air flow.
Mechie3
11-02-2013, 12:30 AM
http://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/forced-induction-159/sts-rear-intercooler-403947/page2/
Scroll down to the orange mustang. I want to do ducting like that using the side scoops. They also used the round inline fans.
Wayne Presley
11-02-2013, 06:48 AM
If it was my car with an air to air IC, I'd duct the side scoops to a plenum over the IC using 4" flex duct with bilge fans inline. The fans would run anytime the car was going less than 35 mph.
RM1SepEx
11-02-2013, 08:42 AM
Wayne, I'm not quite sure what happens to that side scoop air now, it's hard to visualize from what I've seen. I'll be working that kind of stuff soon since I finally got back to it... I was considering such a setup on my stock IC and perhaps moving it would help improve flow. The current setup doesn't appear to be very effective to me..
Wayne Presley
11-02-2013, 09:11 AM
I don't think the stock set up is very effective either based on driving around in the GRM car with the intake air temp displayed on the AIM dash in real time. From the side scoops it's an easy run over the heads and under the frame to the IC for the hoses.
RM1SepEx
11-02-2013, 10:24 AM
How do they expect it to flow? My 05 has a vastly different IC than the 06-07 units that they used in their builds... Do they expect air to flow out of that rectangular vent in the trunk?
Wayne Presley
11-02-2013, 10:33 AM
The wind tunnel confirmed there is low pressure area behind that grill pulling air out of the engine compartment.
Xusia
11-02-2013, 01:28 PM
Just out of dumb curiosity, would it be easier to duct those side vents to the underside of the inercooler, thereby allowing the air to escape out that vent with low pressure area?
Wayne Presley
11-02-2013, 01:42 PM
Just out of dumb curiosity, would it be easier to duct those side vents to the underside of the inercooler, thereby allowing the air to escape out that vent with low pressure area?
No, the intercooler inlets block the area.
Xusia
11-02-2013, 03:55 PM
I was thinking of some kind of box or shroud to ensure the air doesn't leak (much). Or for that matter, what about flipping it over?
Another idea I just had is what about relocating the TMIC directly over that low pressure vent, so the vent sucks air through the IC?
RM1SepEx
11-02-2013, 06:26 PM
The wind tunnel confirmed there is low pressure area behind that grill pulling air out of the engine compartment.
there's no intercooler ducting there though. I want to install aluminum panels for a real trunk, not sure what that will effect.
BrandonDrums
11-04-2013, 11:21 AM
Search precision chassis.
They put an EJ into a boxter
Started off with a massive scoop running air to air.
Guess what theyre running now????
Real time, track proven results
We know this. Again, not trying to say what's optimal, we're trying to address the situation using the donor parts. As you know, the kit is sold as a donor vehicle setup and FFR doesn't provide or require any aftermarket solution for the IC. For the vast majority of buyers, there needs to be an affordable solution to this issue that doesn't require a $2k AWIC setup which we know is overkill for a stock engine running a stock turbo.
http://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/forced-induction-159/sts-rear-intercooler-403947/page2/
Scroll down to the orange mustang. I want to do ducting like that using the side scoops. They also used the round inline fans.
That's more like it. Use some flexible piping like that from the wheel and side scoops (4 points of entry) nozzled to a basic aluminum shroud over the IC and we're in business.
I was thinking of some kind of box or shroud to ensure the air doesn't leak (much). Or for that matter, what about flipping it over?
Another idea I just had is what about relocating the TMIC directly over that low pressure vent, so the vent sucks air through the IC?
Yeah, I also thought of that. It would be actually quite easy to do. Aside from figuring out how to mount the IC, it would be very very easy to get the pipes and angled connectors to pop the TMIC at the back of the car. I fully imagine the airflow there will be more than enough. Not only that but it will take the IC away from the hot engine and turbo drastically reducing heat soak.
It would be less additional piping than a typical FMIC setup on a wrx. It might increase lag a tad but the heat protection will more than make up for it.
Also, using the flexible hoses like this mustang cobra has to duct air from the side vents and nozzle them back towards the IC will do wonders as well. I also like the fan idea. You can get some small radiator fans for pretty cheap to mount in the back. Even with the fans, you're talking about $150 in parts to re-locate the TMIC to the rear vent vs. a couple grand for AWIC. That's more of the ballpark I think most of us are looking for.
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z46/kusto_mizer/IntercoolerDucting.jpg
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z46/kusto_mizer/TrunkFans.jpg
BrandonDrums
11-04-2013, 11:56 AM
Actually, on eBay there are some slim radiator fans that would be just about perfect. You can get them from 7" in diameter -14''. I imagine the 7" will fit perfectly. I think these will be better then the fireplace circulatory fans I found earlier too.
Here's a pair I found for $37 shipped on eBay. Just search for "Slim radiator fans" on eBay and you'll see hundreds.
http://i.ebayimg.com/t/2-X-UNIVERSAL-SLIM-10-PULL-PUSH-RADIATOR-ENGINE-BAY-COOLING-FAN-MOUNTING-BLACK-/00/s/NzAwWDcwMA==/$T2eC16F,!zcE9s4g0uigBQD28IIYT!~~60_3.JPG
JeromeS13
11-04-2013, 05:36 PM
$2k AWIC setup
Where is this pricing coming from? I've priced out all of the parts that I need for a sufficient AWIC for less than $1k...
RM1SepEx
11-04-2013, 07:18 PM
Wayne's setup is around a grand IIRC not sure if it is the single (Wayne's) or dual radiator setup (Erik's)
BrandonDrums
11-07-2013, 09:53 AM
Wayne's setup is around a grand IIRC not sure if it is the single (Wayne's) or dual radiator setup (Erik's)
So I might have exaggerated but that's still pricey for the average builder. At least as an interim solution it's worth figuring out how to get more airflow to the donor IC.
Goldwing
11-08-2013, 12:32 AM
Just throwing it out there and thinking in type. Is there enough room to mount the IC at the side vent? IF the turbo is rotatable the outlet could be directed towards the SideMountIC (SMIC?) to possibly shorten that side of the tubing, then route the cooled air back up to the throttle plate. Minimal tubing length changes. I'm trying to picture the turbo, a hard oil line would need changed to braided, can't picture the cooling lines, then there's the downpipe bolt pattern. If not rotatable, run the turbo outlet across to the driver's side. Room permitting, those fans above could help and even provide mount locations for water sprayers to further aid cooling without getting the whole engine wet. It's a common VW setup, my turbo beetle had it mounted just in front of the passenger side wheel well with quite a bit more tubing. Unless I hear a lot of concern about this from early builds, I doubt I'll do much to keep things simpler, but for anyone thinking about competition, food for thought.
Twinspool
11-21-2013, 09:30 AM
https://webstore.spalusa.com/en-us/productlist/0162/products/fans/low-profile/fans-low+profile.aspx
Better quality than questionably sourced Fleabay items.