FormaCars

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why is Hydroboost Installed at Angle in Mk IV?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    31
    Post Thanks / Like

    Why is Hydroboost Installed at Angle in Mk IV?

    Hydroboost Installed Compressed.jpgHydroboost Top Compressed.jpg

    I installed the Hydroboost from a 2001 Mustang Cobra in the Mk IV using the FFR mounting bracket that has a notched keyway that mounts the hydroboost at an angle (see attached photos). The notch obviously keeps the hydroboost from moving; however, the angle can't be right. Does anyone have experience with this? Thank you for your help.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    League City, Texas
    Posts
    526
    Post Thanks / Like
    I can't answer the "why is it that way?" question, but the '01 hydroboost is mounted at an angle on my Mk 3.1. It looks just like yours. It hasn't been a problem for me and I have almost 10,000 miles on my cobra.

    David
    My Saving Grace: John 3:16

    FFR6687, Graduate #39 in the Class of 2009
    The Factory Five Forum March 2012 POM

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    31
    Post Thanks / Like
    That's good to know. I debated using power brakes since the car is so light. Are you glad you used power brakes? Is your steering manual or power?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    League City, Texas
    Posts
    526
    Post Thanks / Like
    My cobra is a donor build and uses the 2001 GT master cylinder, front and rear calipers and steering rack. I kept the power brakes since the Mustang m/c and calipers are engineered to match as a power brakes set-up. I kept the power steering since the rack ratio is more suited for power steering. I did not use the stock Mustang brake metering valve/proportioning valve/distribution block (whatever you call that thing) and have no issues with brake bias. I'm happy with my choice of power brakes and power steering.

    David
    My Saving Grace: John 3:16

    FFR6687, Graduate #39 in the Class of 2009
    The Factory Five Forum March 2012 POM

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Victoria, BC CANADA
    Posts
    184
    Post Thanks / Like
    I had the same question. When I did a tour of the factory in 2005, they had a hydroboost equipped Coupe chassis in the showroom and I asked about the angled mounting arrangement. I think it was either Mark Weber or Dave Riha (can't remember) that told me it was to provide adequate clearance to remove the MC cap. If it were mounted in a more standard orientation, you might not be able to get your hand under the 3/4" tube to remove the cap and it would make filling it even more problematic than it already is. It's not all that visible once the body is on in any case but I opted to use a remote mounted reservoir to make filling simpler.

    Sean
    MK 3.5 roadster (MK IV body retrofit to MK III chassis) 396W stroker, Edelbrock Pro-Flo 4, AFR 195CC Renegade, XE274HR, GP 4-1-4 SS headers, 3link, 3.73, 15" Halibrand replicas, SAI mod, bumpers, 2 X roll bars, IČ electronics, PS, hydroboosted brakes: 95 GT front, custom MK VIII calipers/Cobra discs rear, FFR front, Levy rear LCA's, Forte front, VPM rear bars, CF dash, mod comp layout w/Auto Meter Ultra-Lites, Lucas tri-bar headlights, coupe taillights, painted by SRP (again!)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FFMetal

Visit our community sponsor