E-Ticket Ride
03-12-2013, 05:08 PM
I have a question regarding the apparent difference between the IRS spacers we received vs. the longer half shafts we can order to fix the IRS CV joint pop-out issue.
It appears that the longer half shafts we can order from FFR are about 9/16" longer than the ones we received with our kit (FFR 7652 Mk IV Base Kit w/IRS). This is based on several posted measurements from folks who received the longer half-shafts
The spacer we received as the fix from FFR is 1/4" thick, based on my measurement today.
My question is: Why the difference?
Is the spacer shorter due to the 1/4" being the upper limit on what a spacer can be when located between the rear spindle and outer end of the axle and still provide sufficient thread outside the hub with the shaft installed?
Is the 9/16" length what it really takes to insure that the tri-lobes maintain proper seating? (I will be running wide rear tires - 315/35R17, and was planning on using Richard Oben's set up and alignment and measurements - 59.5" track width).
Trying to decide on new half shafts or using the spacers.
TIA
Chris Lewis
It appears that the longer half shafts we can order from FFR are about 9/16" longer than the ones we received with our kit (FFR 7652 Mk IV Base Kit w/IRS). This is based on several posted measurements from folks who received the longer half-shafts
The spacer we received as the fix from FFR is 1/4" thick, based on my measurement today.
My question is: Why the difference?
Is the spacer shorter due to the 1/4" being the upper limit on what a spacer can be when located between the rear spindle and outer end of the axle and still provide sufficient thread outside the hub with the shaft installed?
Is the 9/16" length what it really takes to insure that the tri-lobes maintain proper seating? (I will be running wide rear tires - 315/35R17, and was planning on using Richard Oben's set up and alignment and measurements - 59.5" track width).
Trying to decide on new half shafts or using the spacers.
TIA
Chris Lewis