John Ibele
09-30-2011, 09:06 PM
I'm about a year away from taking on this project, and have begun reading up on options for building a Mk4. I'm a busy guy with two boys in their mid- to late teens who will help with the project. I'm not a 'car guy' in terms of spending a lot of time in the garage, but I grew up in a family with older brothers who had British roadsters when I was about 10. Not hard to figure out how the bug eventually bit me! While not terribly knowledgeable about car building, I do have an engineering background, know automotive fundamentals, have built a few boats and spent time as a woodworker, so I know in general the level of effort required to get something in the physical world to yield to your wishes. Plus, I tend to read through things thoroughly beforehand, but also know the right time to just dive in. Should be fun.
I don't plan on looking at this as an open-ended project in terms of either time or money, and although I know I will be winging it with many aspects of the project, I do want to map things out generally before I get started. I do want the car to be reasonably reliable to make the occasional road trip possible, I don't want it to overheat if stuck in traffic, and I would side with comfort over speed to an extent (PS and PB, for instance, but go with stock rear end to save money). No one would build this car just for looks, though: figure I'd want to get 300-350 HP, a good match for non-pricey transmissions from what I can tell. So, figure <$30k total cost, and a builder who is not going to take joy in learning welding or finding an endmill to put in the basement. Or polishing aluminum panels. To hit those objectives, I do have some questions, and I figured there was no better way to get answers than to tap into the fantastic knowledge that's represented by the people who visit this site.
Feel free to chime in on any place I went wrong in my assumptions above (HP, Trans, etc). Otherwise here are my questions to help direct my choices:
(Time and budget) What's the best way to save money without spending gobs of time? 87-93 donor car? Newer donor, but buy the narrow rear separately?
(Reliability and performance) Its clear that folks have found plenty of ways to hit 300-350 HP with a 302, normally aspirated, which is where I started in my thinking. If I went with a carb am I living with inherently less reliability than if I used a newer, fuel-injected engine? How easy would it be to hit that range of HP in a fuel-injected engine without spending lots more dough?
Finally, feel free to share any advice about how to hit the money / complexity / reliability target, or let me know if you think I'm being unrealistic (I understand that revising your plans is part of the whole deal!)
Thanks a bunch in advance!
I don't plan on looking at this as an open-ended project in terms of either time or money, and although I know I will be winging it with many aspects of the project, I do want to map things out generally before I get started. I do want the car to be reasonably reliable to make the occasional road trip possible, I don't want it to overheat if stuck in traffic, and I would side with comfort over speed to an extent (PS and PB, for instance, but go with stock rear end to save money). No one would build this car just for looks, though: figure I'd want to get 300-350 HP, a good match for non-pricey transmissions from what I can tell. So, figure <$30k total cost, and a builder who is not going to take joy in learning welding or finding an endmill to put in the basement. Or polishing aluminum panels. To hit those objectives, I do have some questions, and I figured there was no better way to get answers than to tap into the fantastic knowledge that's represented by the people who visit this site.
Feel free to chime in on any place I went wrong in my assumptions above (HP, Trans, etc). Otherwise here are my questions to help direct my choices:
(Time and budget) What's the best way to save money without spending gobs of time? 87-93 donor car? Newer donor, but buy the narrow rear separately?
(Reliability and performance) Its clear that folks have found plenty of ways to hit 300-350 HP with a 302, normally aspirated, which is where I started in my thinking. If I went with a carb am I living with inherently less reliability than if I used a newer, fuel-injected engine? How easy would it be to hit that range of HP in a fuel-injected engine without spending lots more dough?
Finally, feel free to share any advice about how to hit the money / complexity / reliability target, or let me know if you think I'm being unrealistic (I understand that revising your plans is part of the whole deal!)
Thanks a bunch in advance!