View Full Version : Mk II 15 rear tires
idoxlr8
05-19-2019, 11:22 PM
Has anyone used these with success on a Mk II,Solid axle?
My Goodrich 275/50/15s are done. No room for the 295s.
https://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/PostAddtoCart?langId=-1&catalogId=10002&storeId=10001&krypto=HODxw5OrHQnsyHN1rmLXIVyV2pLy%2FBdUuq5U17yI5 uLOTAau%2BL4A%2Fi6WGTAx2yqubj%2FfuOCAtulpjDEiz3ghC Kwg%2BPIt3D0XYf0XiaBibly6GJM%2BHBv6ZpxVvI4A0GaX5lR njmgJ5AfU0HLFJN2EGBm1ZBq78SVgiD69O5G%2FgDMP5LpSao4 SrDGA%2FZCuYiEL3vr2wmb%2FmvB%2Bkq3X4ZrfYQi%2BJMGDr nCCJS3Ka5dinKIJT9Dv1VKLgxWyociULagsZcQ7pundZhZ6ffH NNHu3jUN%2By69lCMLE4mkutN9HT7XGsIs03BKbez%2F5S8yoe zMRRYo7juX3la1rdbYJIIKZWqaOdMMzqu5iRTTnmpPA%2BuUNz ZEEZYj2Z57QH%2FbXsR3vn5JKhNxqXMDXppAVP3JUKy0H7XC%2 FL4LED%2FXNG6%2BIAbjfrFXmw1jU%2BV7ZxpH24Nu8&ddkey=https%3AOrderItemAdd
CraigS
05-20-2019, 06:25 AM
Over the years I have seen many recommendations for those tires. I quite often mention them in threads like yours. But I have no personal experience w/ them.
Francky
05-20-2019, 10:23 AM
I have an IRS (sorry not solid axle) on my Mk2 and I just installed the M/T ET Street 275 with success, love them so far!
You can compare the dimensions with the one you're looking, you will see these are similar, the ET seems slightly bigger in diameter but slightly narrower on section width.
The M/T ET Street: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/MTT-3451
Tire Diameter: 26.42 in.
Section Width: 11.10 in.
Tread Width: 10.20 in.
Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/R https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mtt-6654
Tire Diameter: 26.10 in.
Section Width: 12.00 in.
Tread Width: 10.60 in.
idoxlr8
05-20-2019, 11:35 AM
I have an IRS (sorry not solid axle) on my Mk2 and I just installed the M/T ET Street 275 with success, love them so far!
You can compare the dimensions with the one you're looking, you will see these are similar, the ET seems slightly bigger in diameter but slightly narrower on section width.
The M/T ET Street: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/MTT-3451
Tire Diameter: 26.42 in.
Section Width: 11.10 in.
Tread Width: 10.20 in.
Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/R https://www.summitracing.com/parts/mtt-6654
Tire Diameter: 26.10 in.
Section Width: 12.00 in.
Tread Width: 10.60 in.
Good information, Thanks!
Are you happy with the sidewall stiffness? I can tolerate the short tread life but have some concerns about how these drag radials corner.
ptstew
05-20-2019, 10:17 PM
I have the same issue with my MK 1 1/2 = 275/50 15 Goodrich’s are shot and no longer available. Is anyone running 295/50 15s with 1/4” or so spacers on these earlier cars?
Richard Oben
05-21-2019, 07:53 AM
If you can find them a 255/60 fits the best on the MK I and II. 295s will rub. The MT in the thread will fit the IRS is almost required and although the 3 link helps the tires usually rub. The 255s are the same diameter as the 295s and look great, with no rub issues. JMHO
There a lot of variables, rim width is one, tire brand is another. We go by the FOGG rule. Fat Old Guys & Gas. If you fill the car with fuel and put two healthy men is the car does it rub, ever, bumps, dips, speed bumps etc? Also to us Rub is like pregnant, it rubs or doesn't PERIOD. None of this 'only rubs once in a while' stuff. We tend to be a bit conservative because of this. But we have never lost a tire due to rub. HTH, Richard.
mburger
05-21-2019, 09:17 AM
I'm running 295/50 Cooper Cobras with my solid axle on my Mk1. No rubbing and no issues.
idoxlr8
05-21-2019, 11:28 AM
If you can find them a 255/60 fits the best on the MK I and II. 295s will rub. The MT in the thread will fit the IRS is almost required and although the 3 link helps the tires usually rub. The 255s are the same diameter as the 295s and look great, with no rub issues. JMHO
There a lot of variables, rim width is one, tire brand is another. We go by the FOGG rule. Fat Old Guys & Gas. If you fill the car with fuel and put two healthy men is the car does it rub, ever, bumps, dips, speed bumps etc? Also to us Rub is like pregnant, it rubs or doesn't PERIOD. None of this 'only rubs once in a while' stuff. We tend to be a bit conservative because of this. But we have never lost a tire due to rub. HTH, Richard.
Thanks for the input Richard.
Bought my Team 3’s from you 15 years ago....Jesus time flies.
Have 255/50/15’s on my fronts and have never had any issues....too skinny for the back IMHO, but I hear you on the rubbing issues. I’ve never had issues with the 275/50/15’s on the rears maybe the 3 link helps?
Steve Powell
05-21-2019, 02:15 PM
I had the SR's but didn't like the way they drove. In my opinion they are kind'a "chunky or blocky". I don't know how else to describe them. They just didn't "roll" nice and smooth. Maybe they are fine on a heavier car but I didn't care for them. I had the 26 x 12" on the back and the 26 x 10 on the front. Took them off and went with Cooper Cobras. 295's on the back. I have old Team III wheels and I run about a 1/4" spacer on the rear. I also have the old first generation 3 link (2002 manufacture time). Those had an issue running 15" wheels. The lower brackets would interfere with the inside of the wheels. I had to cut and reweld them. They worked fine for 17" as they were designed for the early Spec Racers but not good for 15". FF fixed that on later cars. I had BFG originally and now the Coopers. Traction is not stellar but they drive much better.
idoxlr8
05-21-2019, 03:03 PM
I had the SR's but didn't like the way they drove. In my opinion they are kind'a "chunky or blocky". I don't know how else to describe them. They just didn't "roll" nice and smooth. Maybe they are fine on a heavier car but I didn't care for them. I had the 26 x 12" on the back and the 26 x 10 on the front. Took them off and went with Cooper Cobras. 295's on the back. I have old Team III wheels and I run about a 1/4" spacer on the rear. I also have the old first generation 3 link (2002 manufacture time). Those had an issue running 15" wheels. The lower brackets would interfere with the inside of the wheels. I had to cut and reweld them. They worked fine for 17" as they were designed for the early Spec Racers but not good for 15". FF fixed that on later cars. I had BFG originally and now the Coopers. Traction is not stellar but they drive much better.
Steve,
Were you running the BFG 275s or the 295s when you had them?
Francky
05-21-2019, 07:26 PM
Good information, Thanks!
Are you happy with the sidewall stiffness? I can tolerate the short tread life but have some concerns about how these drag radials corner.
I drive the car quite gently, so I'm probably not the best one to tell you about hard corners.
But they do feel extremely well on the few corners I took... mind you my previous tires were 17" but also 17 year old!!!!!
They are so conformable, stick to the road like no tomorrow... very happy with them so far :)
Steve Powell
05-23-2019, 12:39 PM
I was running 275 BFG's before they quit making them. I have 295 Cooper's on now. Yes they will occasionally "touch" somewhere if the car is loaded with two people and luggage and full of fuel and you run over a big dip. (As suggested by Mr. Oben).
ptstew
05-27-2019, 03:28 PM
I'm running 295/50 Cooper Cobras with my solid axle on my Mk1. No rubbing and no issues.
Mark, are you running spacers with these tires? I only have ~1/4” on the left side between my 275/50 15 Radial T/A’s and the quad shock. 295/50’s would rub there unless I added an 8mm spacer. Body side clearance looks ok which your note confirms.
BTW, should have car back with new BluePrint long block in about two weeks.
Phil
mburger
05-27-2019, 03:58 PM
Mark, are you running spacers with these tires? I only have ~1/4” on the left side between my 275/50 15 Radial T/A’s and the quad shock. 295/50’s would rub there unless I added an 8mm spacer. Body side clearance looks ok which your note confirms.
No spacers.
CraigS
05-27-2019, 07:31 PM
Mark, are you running spacers with these tires? I only have ~1/4” on the left side between my 275/50 15 Radial T/A’s and the quad shock. 295/50’s would rub there unless I added an 8mm spacer. Body side clearance looks ok which your note confirms.
BTW, should have car back with new BluePrint long block in about two weeks.
Phil
Try mounting the quad shock reversed from how it is now. Or remove them. On my MkI per G Levy, I ran the FFR lowers w/ the plastic bushings and Ford Motorsport uppers. They had rubber bushings but it was a stiffer design/material than standard uppers. It would hop if I tried to do burnouts so I just didn't.
ptstew
05-28-2019, 10:00 AM
Try mounting the quad shock reversed from how it is now. Or remove them. On my MkI per G Levy, I ran the FFR lowers w/ the plastic bushings and Ford Motorsport uppers. They had rubber bushings but it was a stiffer design/material than standard uppers. It would hop if I tried to do burnouts so I just didn't.
Thanks. I’ll check to see if reversing the shock helps.