PDA

View Full Version : MAF Question



ptstew
02-25-2019, 02:35 PM
I am is process of installing a 1993 Cobra intake manifold on to my 1991 engine. I plan to use a 75mm MAF with the 1991 ECC and 24# injectors. When trying to order a PMA unit from LMR I was told that Mustang MAF’s are either calibrated for a mustang air box or a cold air intake with a 90° bend. I was planning on just clamping an FFR type K&N filter to the inlet of the MAF and they say that isn’t recommended.

Two questions: is LMR correct that I shouldn’t attach the filter like I did with the stock MAF that came with my doner car? If I purchased BBK cold air inlet system is there room for the 90° bend piece between the MAF and the fender well?

Thanks.

davekp
02-25-2019, 03:40 PM
What heads do you have?
What cam?
What throttle body?

ptstew
02-25-2019, 05:08 PM
Thanks. Heads and cam are stock 1991. Have 70mm BBK 1501 throttle body. Car has been a retirement project and used only on stree. Peak performance is not primary objective.

davekp
02-25-2019, 09:46 PM
24 lb injectors are probably too much. The heads won't flow well enough to get any appreciable gain. If it were me, I'd just do the intake and throttle body.

Jeff Kleiner
02-25-2019, 09:53 PM
Dave is absolutely correct. The heads are the bottleneck and you won't get any benefit from 24# injectors (in fact it will become temperamental and run worse at low RPM).

Jeff

Big Blocker
02-26-2019, 01:25 PM
Quote: " I was told that Mustang MAF’s are either calibrated for a mustang air box or a cold air intake with a 90° bend."

This begs for an answer to WHY would Ford calibrate something that reads air flow requiring a restriction (Air Box) or a flow direction piece of equipment (90° Bend) in the incoming air flow path?? I would think logic calls for the straightest path with little or no restriction. The MAF doesn't "read" turbulence (90° bend), it reads an electrically heated wires resistance, which correlates to an amount of air that is trying to "cool" the wire as it passes over it . . .

FWIW, I have a K&N air filter mounted straight to my MAF, have for 17 years now with no issues at all. I have moved the MAF as far as 3' away from the Throttle Body and as close as mounted right to it - no difference in engine behavior.

HTH

And just my 2¢, stay with the factory injector size until you provide better breathing - heads, cam, etc.

Doc

Mike N
02-26-2019, 02:16 PM
Quote: " I was told that Mustang MAF’s are either calibrated for a mustang air box or a cold air intake with a 90° bend."

This begs for an answer to WHY would Ford calibrate something that reads air flow requiring a restriction (Air Box) or a flow direction piece of equipment (90° Bend) in the incoming air flow path?? I would think logic calls for the straightest path with little or no restriction. The MAF doesn't "read" turbulence (90° bend), it reads an electrically heated wires resistance, which correlates to an amount of air that is trying to "cool" the wire as it passes over it . . .

FWIW, I have a K&N air filter mounted straight to my MAF, have for 17 years now with no issues at all. I have moved the MAF as far as 3' away from the Throttle Body and as close as mounted right to it - no difference in engine behavior.

HTH

And just my 2¢, stay with the factory injector size until you provide better breathing - heads, cam, etc.

Doc

The factory EECIV has a 'back flow' calibration table that accounts for the MAF location in the intake. If the MAF is close to a bend, air filter, or throttle body there can be some back flow that the stock EECIV accounts for.

ptstew
02-26-2019, 02:37 PM
Thanks, guys, for all the great responses. I am returning the 24# injectors and buying new 19#ers to replace my 28 year old ones. I’ll also stick with my stock 55mm air mass with the filter directly attached. Saves me a few bucks.

Phil